Standard modules staged in a packing yard with crate marks

Standard Models

Standard building options for a precise RFQ

Use four illustrative brief labels to compare suppliers for office, dormitory, linked-room and sanitary requirements. These labels are internal enquiry aids, not ATCO product models or verified supplier series. The supplier confirms the offered model and drawing revision.

Request a Standard Model Quote

Model dashboard

The dashboard lists RFQ fields rather than guaranteed product specifications. Record length, width and height in mm and attach the current supplier drawing. Container-like dimensions do not establish ISO CSC certification or enclosed-container transport feasibility.

M20 Office

External
Supplier length x width x height in mm
Wall
Core, thickness, density and verified U-value
Lift
Rated points and lifting diagram required
40HQ
Packed geometry and carrier review required

Use: procurement office, meeting room, drawing issue. Electrical trunk can stop at the distribution board. Wet rooms are not in this model.

M40 Dorm

External
Supplier length x width x height in mm
Wall
Core proposal and density in kg/m3 required
Layout
2 bedrooms or a 4-bunk room
Floor
Live load noted per bunk layout, not assumed

Use: workforce accommodation. Record occupancy, room arrangement, acoustic target and fire strategy before a supplier selects the envelope. The quotation identifies the bunk or bedroom layout, while the buyer confirms the operating pattern and local safety requirements.

M60 Linked

Group
Module count and connection drawing required
Joint
Corridor connection drawn as a thermal bridge
Storey
Single storey in the standard file
MEP
Shared electrical trunk, separate wet cores

Use: classroom row or a clinic plus waiting room. Multi-storey proposals require separate engineering and interface review; this illustrative brief does not define a structural system.

M10 Ablution

External
Supplier length x width x height in mm
Floor
Drainage slope per approved wet-room design
Frame
Steel grade and coating mass to verify
Scope
Factory drops or empty sleeves, marked

Use: showers and toilets beside a camp. Mirrors, tile and the final sanitary ware stay on the fit-out line so a late fixture change does not reopen the steel.

Core choice is a trade, not a slogan

Compare EPS, PIR and rock wool against supplier test evidence, mass, installed cost and the project fire strategy. PIR can reduce thickness for an insulation target, while rock wool changes mass and handling. Neither a core name nor a panel test replaces whole-system evidence with joints and openings.

Core Why buyers pick it What it costs you Sheet figure
EPS Lower mass, lower material price, simple supply Fire strategy needs a harder look; heat can drive a thicker wall Specify thickness and density in the RFQ
PIR Can meet a given thermal target with a thinner core, depending on the tested assembly Still a foam. System fire evidence is separate from the panel line Ask for verified W/m2K and assembly basis
Rock wool Used when the fire and acoustic note is the main constraint Heavier lift, higher price, edges must stay dry in transit Supplier thickness and handling review required

Coating is the paired argument. For a proposed galvanized frame, verify coating designation, exposure suitability and repairs at cuts or drilled holes with the selected supplier. Painted carbon steel is the practical face for a large stair or a coloured link beam. Its life follows the paint system and the wash-down the operator will actually do. Intumescent coating, when a steel member needs it, is specified by the fire strategy. It is not sprayed onto every stud by default.

How the opening unit is checked

A repeatable inspection starts with the approved supplier drawing and agreed acceptance criteria. Record ambient conditions and tool identification, then measure the external envelope and both full diagonals with suitable calibrated equipment. Photograph joint details and lifting points and attach actual readings. The inspector reports deviations for buyer disposition; no tolerance or passed result is claimed by this page.

Sheets you can request

Request these document types during sourcing. Supplier availability, current revision and applicable scope require confirmation; no nonexistent public file is offered for download.

Approval sequence for a standard option

  1. 01

    Record the envelope

    Write external and usable dimensions separately in mm. Ask the supplier to identify the proposed series, drawing revision, packed size and mass. Carrier review determines the actual transport arrangement; visual similarity to a freight container confers no transport certification.

  2. 02

    Review the core

    Compare thickness, density, U-value basis and assembly-level fire evidence. The selected supplier and project professionals verify compliance. A sample joint can support a review of workmanship, but cannot establish structural or fire performance for an entire building.

  3. 03

    Verify the packing plan

    Compare volumetric and panelized proposals using crate dimensions, securing details, site labour and unloading equipment. A higher packing density can transfer assembly work to site. The buyer decides after seeing the installed scope, rather than accepting an unsupported 40HQ count.

  4. 04

    Approve the RFQ revision

    Record wind, snow, seismic criteria, foundation interface, fit-out and destination port as confirmed or unresolved. The buyer authorizes the next procurement stage after supplier clarifications. This sourcing service follows documents and appointments; it does not issue permits or release manufacturing on its own authority.

Quote a model number

Name M20, M40, M60 or M10, the quantity, the destination and the core. If the plan does not fit, say which dimension failed.

Request a Standard Model Quote